The Spearman Brown Prophecy Formula Youtube

To adjust for this, psychometricians use the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula. How to download roms for citra. It takes the split half correlation as input and converts it to an.

. Allen, M.; Yen W. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Stanley, J. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement. Second edition. Washington, DC: American Council on Education., & Thissen, D.

True score theory: The traditional method. Thissen, (Eds.), Test Scoring.

Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. Kelley, T. Note on the Reliability of a Test: A reply to Dr. Crum ’s criticism. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 193–204. Doi: 10.1037 / h0072471.Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M.

The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151-160. Doi: 10.1007 / BF02288391. Eisinga, R.; Te Grotenhuis, M.; Pelzer, B. 'The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown?'

International Journal of Public Health. 58 (4): 637-642. Doi: 10.1007 / s00038-012-0416-3. Cho, E. Making reliability reliable: A systematic approach to reliability coefficients.

Organizational Research Methods, 19, 651-682. Doi:10.11116656239. Flanagan, J. A proposed procedure for increasing the efficiency of objective tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 17-21. Doi: 10.1037 / h0057430. A simplified procedure for determining the reliability of a test by split-halves.

Harvard Educational Review, 9, 99-103. Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282. Doi: 10.1007 / BF02288892. Cho, E. Making reliability reliable: A systematic approach to reliability coefficients.

Organizational Research Methods, 19, 651-682. Doi: 10.1177 / 656239. Raju, N.

New formula for estimating total test reliability from parts ofunequal length. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention ofAPA, 5, 143-144. Angoff, W. Test reliability and effective test length. Psychometrika, 18(1), 1-14. Feldt, L.

Estimation of the reliability of a test divided into two parts of unequal length. Psychometrika, 40(4), 557-561. Cho, E. Making reliability reliable: A systematic approach to reliability coefficients. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 651-682. Doi:10.11116656239.

Cowles, M. (2005) Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective. New York: Psychology Press. Later published as a book Brown, W. The essentials of mental measurement.

London: Cambridge University Press. Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things.

American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101. Cho, E. Fixing a broken clock: A historical review of the originators reliability coefficients including Cronbach's alpha. Survey Research, 19 (2), 23-54. Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things.

American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101. Cronbach, L.

J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory.

British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 137-163. Doi: 10.1111 / j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x. Cho, E.

Fixing a broken clock: A historical review of the originators reliability coefficients including Cronbach's alpha. Survey Research, 19 (2), 23-54. Traub, R. Classical test theory in historical perspective. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16, 8-14. Doi: 10.1111 / j.1745-3992.1997.tb00603.x.

Stanley, J. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement.

Second edition. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Eisinga, R.; Te Grotenhuis, M.; Pelzer, B. 'The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown?' International Journal of Public Health. 58 (4): 637–642.References. Spearman, Charles, C. Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.

Brown, W. Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.

ObjectivesThere are similarities between the different forms of reliability, such as internal consistency (internal reliability) and interrater and intrarater reliability. Reliability coefficients that are based on classical test theory can be expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), such as Cronbach's alpha. The Spearman–Brown prophecy formula (SB formula) is used to calculate the reliability when the number of items in a questionnaire is changed. This paper aims to increase insight into reliability studies by pointing to the assumptions of reliability coefficients, similarities between various coefficients, and the subsequent new applications of reliability coefficients.

Design, Settings and ResultsThe origin and assumptions of Cronbach's alpha and the SB formula are discussed. Cronbach's alpha is written as an ICC formula, using the well-known property that taking the average value of a number of ratings increases the reliability of a measurement. We illustrate with an example that the ICC formulas for average measurements of multiple raters and the SB formula give similar results.

This implies that the SB formula can be used to decide on the number of measurements to be averaged and thus on the number of raters required, for obtaining measurements with acceptable reliability, even if the variance components of the ICC formula are not known. Using the same example, we illustrate the principle of “Cronbach's alpha if item deleted” to decide on the poorest performing raters in a set of raters.